Tips for Serving as the Local Education Agency Representatives on IEP TeamsBy Rose Kilmurray, Eva Kubinski, Tim Peerenboom, Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Introduction The field of special education uses a lot of acronyms like IEP, FAPE, and LRE. While using acronyms can be an efficient way of communicating in some circumstances, it can become problematic when talking with people who do not understand the lingo, or when IEP team members forget what those acronyms represent. For example, saying, “An Individual Education Program ensures a student with a disability receives a Free Appropriate Public Education in the Least Restrictive Environment,” is much clearer than saying, “An IEP provides FAPE in the LRE.” While special educators and related services professionals may well understand this, parents and often general educators, including principals, may not. Another often used, but less understood acronym, is the “LEA Rep,” which is sometimes even shortened to simply “LEA.” With the many demands placed upon building administrators, it might be easy to perceive this title and this role as unimportant. But an examination of the full title and responsibilities of the Local Education Agency Representative underscores just how vital the role is. According to 34 CFR 300.321, this Representative of the Public Agency: (i) Is qualified to provide, or supervise the provision of, specially designed instruction to meet the unique needs of children with disabilities;
(ii) Is knowledgeable about the general education curriculum; and
(iii) Is knowledgeable about the availability of resources of the public agency.
What Administrators Need to Know Here are some tips for before, during, and after the IEP meeting that can help LEA Reps ensure FAPE in the LRE. Engage IEP team members before the meeting:
Engage and facilitate collaboration during the meeting:
Engage with IEP team members after the meeting:
Summary The Local Education Agency Representative has a crucial role in facilitating the IEP team process before, during, and after the IEP team meeting. It is important to recognize, however, that IEPs can be as complex as the children they are written to support. Because of that, disagreements in some IEP team processes are inevitable. In such cases, resources such as WSPEI’s Communication Options for Families and DPI’s Dispute Resolution Options are available to help productively navigate contentious situations and disagreements. Hopefully, the tips shared in this article will not only help to avoid IEP team disputes but also will help facilitate efficient and effective IEP team meetings that result in plans designed to increase access, engagement, and progress in the curriculum for students with disabilities. |